{"id":73313,"date":"2026-06-17T17:18:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-17T21:18:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/?p=73313"},"modified":"2026-06-17T17:19:14","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T21:19:14","slug":"smallest-cars-as-brand-milestones-how-minimal-dimensions-shaped-automotive-identity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/smallest-cars-as-brand-milestones-how-minimal-dimensions-shaped-automotive-identity\/","title":{"rendered":"Smallest Cars as Brand Milestones How Minimal Dimensions Shaped Automotive Identity"},"content":{"rendered":"

What Drives Automakers to Build Their Smallest Cars?<\/p>\n

The impulse to manufacture exceptionally small vehicles has rarely been driven by mere novelty. Instead, it emerges from a confluence of regulatory, economic, and cultural pressures that periodically make compactness a virtue rather than a liability. Evidence from the historical record suggests that, in most cases, the smallest cars produced by major brands were not the result of a linear technological progression but rather a response to acute constraints: urban congestion, fuel scarcity, or legislative mandates (such as Japan\u2019s kei car regulations). The brief existence of models like the BMW Isetta or Citroen Ami underscores a recurring pattern\u2014these vehicles are less evolutionary endpoints than adaptive experiments, often produced at the margins of mainstream automotive strategy.<\/p>\n

Yet, the notion that smallness equates to irrelevance is misleading. The smallest car in a manufacturer\u2019s history often reveals more about the brand\u2019s capacity for strategic flexibility than its flagship models do. For instance, the Citroen Ami, with its 2489mm length and urban-focused electric drivetrain, is less a technological marvel than a canary in the coal mine for shifting European urban policy and consumer sentiment. The Ami\u2019s existence signals a willingness to test the boundaries of what constitutes a car, a move that, while commercially risky, may presage broader shifts in mobility norms.<\/p>\n

How Do Regulatory and Market Forces Shape the Limits of Smallness?<\/p>\n

The data on vehicle lengths\u2014ranging from the 4782mm Hummer H3 to the 1860mm Renault Voiturette\u2014reflects more than engineering choices; it encodes the regulatory and market environments of their time. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the Japanese kei car segment, where a strict three-meter length cap (until 1976) produced a generation of vehicles\u2014Honda N360, Mitsubishi Minica, Subaru 360, Suzuki Fronte\u2014whose dimensions were dictated more by statute than by consumer preference. The evidence suggests that, under such conditions, manufacturers converged on near-identical solutions, with most kei cars measuring precisely 2995mm.<\/p>\n

However, the practical significance of these regulatory constraints is double-edged. While they fostered innovation in packaging and efficiency, they also imposed structural limitations on safety, comfort, and performance. The subsequent relaxation of kei car rules in 1976, which allowed slightly larger vehicles, was not merely a technical adjustment but a tacit admission of the trade-offs inherent in extreme miniaturization. The persistence of the segment, despite these limitations, points to the enduring appeal of ultra-compact cars in dense urban contexts, but also to the limits of their scalability beyond niche markets.<\/p>\n

Are the Smallest Cars Mere Curiosities, or Do They Signal Deeper Shifts?<\/p>\n

It is tempting to dismiss the likes of the BMW Isetta or Aston Martin Cygnet as historical footnotes\u2014anomalies produced by unique circumstances. Yet, such a reading risks overlooking the second-order effects these vehicles exerted on brand identity and market perception. The Cygnet, for example, was a strategic attempt by Aston Martin to meet fleet-average emissions targets, leveraging the Toyota iQ platform to satisfy regulatory requirements without diluting its core product line. The commercial failure of the Cygnet is often cited as evidence of the incompatibility between luxury branding and extreme smallness, but this interpretation may be incomplete. The episode reveals the structural tension between regulatory compliance and brand coherence\u2014a tension that is likely to intensify as emissions standards tighten globally.<\/p>\n

Moreover, the recurrence of ultra-compact vehicles at moments of economic or regulatory stress suggests that their periodic resurgence is not accidental. The postwar SEAT 600, for instance, catalyzed mass motorization in Spain, while the Citroen Ami\u2019s recent launch coincides with renewed interest in urban micro-mobility. These vehicles, though rarely bestsellers, function as barometers of broader societal anxieties and aspirations\u2014whether about energy, space, or environmental impact.<\/p>\n

Who Benefits\u2014and Who Loses\u2014When Cars Shrink?<\/p>\n

The distributional consequences of ultra-small cars are rarely uniform. Urban residents, particularly in cities with acute congestion or limited parking, stand to benefit most directly from vehicles like the Citroen Ami or Smart Fortwo. These cars offer a pragmatic solution to the spatial constraints of modern cities, albeit often at the expense of highway capability or crash safety. Conversely, rural or suburban consumers, for whom range and versatility are paramount, find little utility in such vehicles.<\/p>\n

There are also less visible stakeholders. Municipal authorities, seeking to reduce emissions and reclaim public space, may view the proliferation of microcars as a policy win. Yet, the evidence remains mixed on whether such vehicles meaningfully reduce overall car dependency or simply add to urban traffic in a different guise. The automotive industry itself faces a strategic dilemma: while small cars can serve as regulatory compliance tools or brand halo products, their thin profit margins and limited global appeal make them a risky long-term bet.<\/p>\n

What Structural Blind Spots Persist in Mainstream Interpretations?<\/p>\n

Mainstream narratives about small cars often oscillate between nostalgia and ridicule, obscuring the complex interplay of forces that produce them. There is a persistent blind spot regarding the role of non-market actors\u2014governments, urban planners, and regulatory agencies\u2014in shaping the feasibility and desirability of ultra-compact vehicles. The assumption that consumer demand alone determines the fate of small cars ignores the extent to which policy frameworks and infrastructural investments (or lack thereof) can either enable or foreclose their adoption.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the focus on length as the primary metric of smallness risks missing more consequential dimensions: energy efficiency, lifecycle emissions, and integration with public transit systems. The evidence suggests that, under specific conditions, small cars can serve as effective complements to broader mobility ecosystems, but only if supported by coherent policy and infrastructure. Without such alignment, they remain curiosities\u2014technically impressive, but strategically marginal.<\/p>\n

What Should an Informed Reader Conclude?<\/p>\n

The history of the smallest cars from major manufacturers is not a story of technological determinism or consumer whimsy, but one of adaptive response to shifting constraints. Their periodic emergence signals moments of inflection in the automotive landscape\u2014moments when the logic of bigness is temporarily suspended in favor of experimentation. For policymakers and industry strategists, the lesson is clear: the viability of ultra-compact cars depends less on their intrinsic merits than on the broader systems\u2014regulatory, infrastructural, cultural\u2014in which they are embedded.<\/p>\n

For the informed reader, the practical takeaway is one of skepticism toward both hype and dismissal. Small cars are neither the inevitable future nor relics of a bygone era; rather, they are contingent artifacts, whose significance lies in their capacity to reveal the boundaries of what is possible\u2014and permissible\u2014in automotive design. The next time a manufacturer unveils a car that seems improbably small, the question to ask is not \u201cwhy so tiny?\u201d but \u201cwhat conditions made this possible, and what might it presage for the rest of the industry?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\"Very<\/a><\/p>\n

Do good things come in small packages? David Finlay investigates<\/p>\n

\n

Very occasionally a manufacturer devotes itself entirely to a single car, such as the Tucker 48 or the Clan Crusader. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

There will usually be one model which is the smallest the company has ever made.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

So let\u2019s have a look at them. Here, in descending order of length \u2013 or ascending order of shortness, if you prefer \u2013 are the cars from 30 brands which had the least distance between their fronts and rears.<\/h2>\n

\"So\n<\/p>\n

\u00a0We\u2019re including only passenger vehicles from brands which still exist today, though our first example involves one which is now a sub-brand within GMC.<\/p>\n

\n

Hummer H3<\/h2>\n

\"Hummer\n<\/p>\n

Hummer is renowned for producing very large vehicles, but since its portfolio includes several models it stands to reason that one of them must be shorter than the others.<\/p>\n

That model is the H3, based on a similar platform to the one used for the Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon pickup trucks. In SUV, rather than pickup, form, it measured 4782mm (188.3in), figures whose like you won\u2019t be seeing again in this article.<\/p>\n

\n

DS 3<\/h2>\n

\"DS\n<\/p>\n

The DS 3 first appeared in 2010 as a premium variant of the Citroen C3. Six years later, the Citroen badge was dropped when DS Automobiles was established as a separate brand.<\/p>\n

Several new DS models have been introduced since then, including a second-generation 3, but the first remains the shortest at 3948mm (155.4in).<\/p>\n

\n

Volvo 66<\/h2>\n

\"Volvo\n<\/p>\n

Volvo\u2019s first car was the 1927 \u00d6V4, which measured 4150mm (163.4in). No shorter Volvo was produced until nearly half a century later. The later vehicle was a slightly reworked DAF 66, designed and manufactured by the Dutch Daf company, which Volvo bought in the mid 1970s.<\/p>\n

Volvo made very few changes, retaining the little Renault engine and the then extremely unusual continuously variable transmission, but in the interests of safety it added larger front and rear bumpers, extending the car\u2019s length by a few inches. Despite that, it became \u2013 and still is \u2013 the shortest ever Volvo, at 3900mm (153.5in).<\/p>\n

\n

Alfa Romeo Giulietta Spider<\/h2>\n

\"Alfa\n<\/p>\n

Although it\u2019s relatively rare, a few Alfa Romeos measuring less than four metres have gone into production. These include the Alfasud, the much more recent 4C and a version of the Renault Dauphine built under licence.<\/p>\n

Shorter than all of these, however, is the Spider version of the 1950s Giulietta. According to the Museo Storico Alfa Romeo in Arese, which owns one, it measures 3860mm (152.0in).<\/p>\n

\n

Chrysler Sunbeam<\/h2>\n

\"Chrysler\n<\/p>\n

The smallest Chrysler-badged car was a UK model built by Chrysler Europe at the Linwood factory in Scotland from 1977 to 1981. Latterly badged as a Talbot, it was 3830mm (150.8in) long from bumper to bumper, a measurement which would be inconceivable for any Chrysler built in the US.<\/p>\n

A still smaller Linwood-built car known variously as the Hillman Imp, Singer Chamois and Sunbeam Stiletto was sometimes referred to (including on the covers of workshop manuals) as the Chrysler Imp, but it does not appear to have been sold under that name.<\/p>\n

\n

Alpine A106<\/h2>\n

\"Alpine\n<\/p>\n

The first sports car produced by Dieppe Renault dealer Jean R\u00e9d\u00e9l\u00e9 (1922-2007) was manufactured using components from the Renault 4CV. There\u2019s a limit to how large anything powered by a 750cc engine can be, and sure enough the A106 was notably petite at 3700mm (145.7in).<\/p>\n

Alpine\u2019s only current model, the A110, is small by modern standards, but at nearly 4.2 metres it dwarfs the much earlier A106.<\/p>\n

\n

Mercedes A-Class<\/h2>\n

\"Mercedes\n<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s A-Class has almost nothing to do with the original model launched in 1997. This curious machine had a lot of interior space due to its height rather than its length, which was exceptionally modest for a Mercedes-badged car.<\/p>\n

It started out at 3575mm (140.7in), but increased to 3606mm (142.0in) during a 2001 facelift. Even the long-wheelbase version was comfortably under four metres at 3776mm (148.7in).<\/p>\n

\n

Skoda Citigo<\/h2>\n

\"Skoda\n<\/p>\n

The Citigo was Skoda\u2019s only city car to date, and measured just 3540mm (139.4in). It was almost exactly the same thing as two other small VW Group products, the Seat Mii and the Volkswagen up!. Of the trio, however, it was the only one which can be said to have been the shortest in the history of its brand.<\/p>\n

\n

Audi 50<\/h2>\n

\"Audi\n<\/p>\n

The 50 was an anomalous car for Audi. Launched in 1974, it was the brand\u2019s first supermini, quite unlike any other model wearing the same badge. It didn\u2019t last for long as an Audi, but had much more success as the first-generation Volkswagen Polo.<\/p>\n

Audi did not try anything like this again until the A2 was introduced in the late 20th century. It\u2019s now thought of as a small car, but it was a giant compared with the 50, which was around 3500mm (137.8in) long, depending on who you ask. The \u2018little\u2019 A2 was more than a foot longer.<\/p>\n

\n

Volkswagen Polo<\/h2>\n

\"Volkswagen\n<\/p>\n

The Polo\/50 is the shortest car yet produced by both Audi and Volkswagen, at approximately 3500mm (137.8in). Two of them parked front to back would be only slightly longer than VW\u2019s largest current model, the Grand California 680.<\/p>\n

The GTI version of the Lupo city car, which was very slightly shorter than the less powerful variants, ran the first-generation Polo close, but at 3524mm it exceeded the earlier model\u2019s length by nearly an inch.<\/p>\n

\n

Chevrolet Matiz\/Lechi<\/h2>\n

\"Chevrolet\n<\/p>\n

GM\u2019s Korean supermini has been produced across four generations since 1998. The first two versions both measured 3495mm (137.6in), though subsequent models have been somewhat larger.<\/p>\n

The car has been marketed around the world under several names. Two of these are Chevrolet Matiz and Chevrolet Lechi, making this easily the shortest vehicle ever to wear Chevy branding.<\/p>\n

PICTURE: UK-market Matiz with Daewoo branding<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Hyundai Amica and Eon<\/h2>\n

\"Hyundai\n<\/p>\n

Also known as the Atos, Atoz and Santro, among other things, the Amica was a tall but narrow and short city car measuring just 3495mm (137.6in) from front to rear. The later Hyundai Eon, sold for most of the 2010s, was similar in concept and identical in length.<\/p>\n

PICTURE: Hyundai Amica<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Kia Pride<\/h2>\n

\"Kia\n<\/p>\n

The first of three models called Kia Pride was a clone of the Ford Festiva (also known as the Mazda 121) manufactured in South Korea from 1987 to 2000.<\/p>\n

At 3475mm (136.8in), it was the shortest Kia-badged car ever sold. Even the little first-generation Picanto, which arrived three years after the original Pride was discontinued, was longer at 3535mm (139.2in).<\/p>\n

\n

SEAT 600<\/h2>\n

\"SEAT\n<\/p>\n

Although it was really only a Fiat built under licence, the 600 was arguably Spain\u2019s most important car, since it was partly responsible for the enormous post-war growth of the Spanish economy.<\/p>\n

From 1957 to 1963, before it was slightly extended, the 600 measured just 3280mm (129.1in), making it far shorter than the Mii city car of the 21st century.<\/p>\n

\n

Aston Martin Cygnet<\/h2>\n

\"Aston\n<\/p>\n

In a move which must have seemed like a good idea at the time, but later proved not to be, Aston Martin briefly built its own luxurious, and eye-wateringly expensive, version of the Toyota iQ city car.<\/p>\n

The unlikeliest of all Astons was also the shortest, taking up just 3078mm (121.2in) of road space. It could have been less than that, but a more prominent nose made the Cygnet slightly longer than the Toyota it was based on.<\/p>\n

\n

Honda N360<\/h2>\n

\"Honda\n<\/p>\n

Until 1976, when the rules were relaxed slightly, no car could be included in the Japanese kei class if it measured so much as a gnat\u2019s crotchet over three metres. Like several other models of its place and time, some of which we\u2019ll be discussing in a moment, the Honda N360 just squeaked under this with a length of 2995mm (117.9in).\u00a0<\/p>\n

The related N600 did not qualify, partly because it was 3100mm (122.0in) long and partly because its engine was too large.<\/p>\n

\n

Mitsubishi Minica<\/h2>\n

\"Mitsubishi\n<\/p>\n

Mitsubishi produced Minica kei cars in eight generations over half a century. For the first two generations and most of the third, they all measured 2995mm (117.9in).<\/p>\n

In January 1976, the maximum permitted length of a kei car was raised from 3.0 to 3.2 metres. Mitsubishi responded by fitting larger bumpers to the Minica, increasing its length to more than 3000mm for the first time.<\/p>\n

PICTURE: 1962 Minica<\/strong><\/p>\n

Photo licence: https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode<\/p>\n

\n

Subaru 360<\/h2>\n

\"Subaru\n<\/p>\n

Throughout its life, Subaru\u2019s first car was subject to the kei car limit of 3.0 metres. Several lengths have been quoted for this model, but 2995mm (117.9in) is both the most common and the most likely.<\/p>\n

It also applies to the 360\u2019s successor, the Rex, and to early versions of the later R-2, which grew when the kei rules were altered in 1976.<\/p>\n

\n

Suzuki Fronte<\/h2>\n

\"Suzuki\n<\/p>\n

In what must now have become a familiar tale, all Suzuki Fronte kei cars measured 2995mm (117.9in) in the days when they were not allowed to be more than 3.0 metres long.<\/p>\n

The earlier Suzulight models, which were built by Suzuki but did not carry the company\u2019s branding, are reported to have been very slightly shorter, at 2990mm (117.7in).<\/p>\n

\n

Toyota iQ<\/h2>\n

\"Toyota\n<\/p>\n

Toyota has built many short cars over the years, but it excelled itself with the iQ (marketed in the US as a Scion) which was produced from 2008 to 2016. At 2985mm (117.5mm) it easily met the current kei car regulations as far as length was concerned, though all the engines it was fitted with were far too large to qualify.<\/p>\n

Oddly, the iQ was much shorter than the 3395mm (133.7in) Toyota Pixis Joy, a rebadged version of the Daihatsu Cast which definitely was a kei car.<\/p>\n

\n

Cadillac Model A<\/h2>\n

\"Cadillac\n<\/p>\n

The first cars produced by manufacturers established around the turn of the 20th century were often extremely small, so you\u2019ll be reading about several of them here.<\/p>\n

We\u2019ll start with the original Cadillac, which first appeared in the 1903 model year. The Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn reports that the Model A Runabout in its collection is a mere 2807mm (110.5in) long. For reference, two of them could just about hide behind a single example of today\u2019s Cadillac Escalade ESV.<\/p>\n

\n

Ford Model A<\/h2>\n

\"Ford\n<\/p>\n

The Ford Motor Company\u2019s first car bore a close resemblance to the Cadillac of the same name, a coincidence partly explained by the fact that Cadillac rose from the ashes of Henry Ford\u2019s first company that he departed in 1902.<\/p>\n

There were important differences, though. Each car had its own engine, and the Ford was shorter. According to the Henry Ford Museum, which has an example of both Model As, its Ford measures 2616mm (103.0mm).<\/p>\n

\n

smart fortwo<\/h2>\n

\"smart\n<\/p>\n

The original smart became known as the fortwo after several years to distinguish it from the much larger forfour supermini.<\/p>\n

Although its passenger compartment was impressively spacious, there was very little either in front of or behind it. In its first generation, the car was only 2500mm (98.4in) long. Later models have reached nearly 2.7 metres.<\/p>\n

\n

Vauxhall 5hp and 6hp<\/h2>\n

\"Vauxhall\n<\/p>\n

The Vauxhall 5hp went on sale in May 1903, and was replaced the following February by the 6hp, which was basically the same car with a larger engine, a reverse gear and, latterly, a proper steering wheel rather than a tiller.<\/p>\n

Both were 2489mm (98.0in) long, a figure Vauxhall never approached again. The 12-14hp model, which went into production before the end of 1904, was very much larger.<\/p>\n

\n

Citroen Ami<\/h2>\n

\"Citroen\n<\/p>\n

Citroen has been building small cars for many decades, but the shortest of all went on sale only recently.<\/p>\n

The all-electric Ami – named after, but not related to, another Citroen introduced in 1961 – is designed primarily for urban use, and measures only 2489mm (94.9in), which would have been considered modest even in the early 1900s. The Ami has space for two, a single-charge range of 46 miles, has a top speed of 28mph, and can be purchased from \u00a38095 in the UK.<\/p>\n

\n

Fiat 3.5hp<\/h2>\n

\"Fiat\n<\/p>\n

The first Fiat was created by the Italian Welleyes brand, which had until then built only bicycles. The project was taken over by Giovanni Agnelli (1866-1945), who changed the car\u2019s name and put it into production in 1899.<\/p>\n

Almost every part was contained within the space between the front and rear axles, which were very close together. The whole contraption was just 2300mm (90.6in) long.<\/p>\n

\n

Peugeot Type 2<\/h2>\n

\"Peugeot\n<\/p>\n

The Type 2 is generally referred to as Peugeot\u2019s inaugural production car, though only four were built and it took nearly a year to sell the first one. Introduced nearly a decade before the Fiat 3.5hp, it was coincidentally shared that car\u2019s length of 2300mm (90.6in). This makes it even shorter than both the Peugeot VLV, a tiny electric city car built during the Second World War, and the minuscule BB1 electric concept displayed at the Frankfurt Show in 2009.<\/p>\n

\n

BMW Isetta<\/h2>\n

\"BMW\n<\/p>\n

BMW acquired the rights to build the Isetta bubble car from Italian company Iso, and almost completely redesigned it while retaining the same basic shape.<\/p>\n

Different sources quote very different lengths for the revised car. BMW\u2019s own figure is 2280mm (89.8in), which makes the Isetta very nearly a foot shorter than the 2570mm (101.2in) wheelbase of the company\u2019s smallest car produced so far in the 21st century, the i3, which totals 4011mm in length.<\/p>\n

\n

Opel Patent Motorwagen<\/h2>\n

\"Opel\n<\/p>\n

The full name of Opel\u2019s first car is Patent Motorwagen System Lutzmann, after Friedrich Lutzmann (1859-1930), from whom Opel bought the rights to produce it.<\/p>\n

Sources generally agree that the machine was 2150mm (84.6in) long, which seems about right from the available photographs and film footage.<\/p>\n

\n

Renault Voiturette<\/h2>\n

\"Renault\n<\/p>\n

Renault became a car manufacturer as a direct result of founder Louis Renault (1877-1944) successfully climbing the steep Rue Lepic in Paris in his prototype Voiturette, impressing onlookers to such an extent that they wanted similar vehicles of their own.<\/p>\n

Like the prototype, they were absolutely tiny, even by the standards of 1899 – from stem to stern, they measured 1860mm (73.2in). By comparison, the electric Twizy, today considered an extremely short vehicle at 2338mm (92.0in), seems like a sprawling monstrosity.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":73314,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,137],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73313","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-featured","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73313"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73313\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73315,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73313\/revisions\/73315"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73314"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73313"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73313"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalvillagespace.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}