Pakistan
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Lt. Gen. Tariq Khan |

The US finds it does not know how to dismount the tiger. The US is finding the War in Afghanistan a little too hot for its liking and why not; it was a war that remained in search of a strategy and failed to find it. It’s not that I wish to gloat, nor that I want to say ‘I told you so’, but that one is forced to respond when confronted with accusations that the US failed in Afghanistan on account of Pakistan.

That we were a tricky two-faced partner. Since I was closely associated with this conflict for a number of years and since I am aware of the things that happened, it is only right that people such as me must speak for Pakistan just as we fought for Pakistan.

We shall respond by causing as much damage as we can in Kabul, Jalalabad, Kandahar, and Bagram. We have the range, capability, and capacity; they should be wary of testing it

That a hundred and fifty thousand NATO troops have been overwhelmed by the imagined hoards that Pakistan sent across the border, challenges my professional understanding of the situation. That this is the same border that neither Afghanistan recognizes and resists its management or fencing, of course, cannot have escaped US attention.

Read more: Who are Afghan Taliban and why the US won’t be able…

That Pakistan has seven times the number of posts than Afghanistan and the US combined does not seem to make any headway. That Afghan communication systems are functioning despite Pakistan’s repeated requests that they are shut down while Pakistani SIMs are down and out is another moot point. That three Generals of the US Army promised additional border deployment with a US brigade across the North Waziristan Border remains a promise unfulfilled and forgotten.

That the US unilaterally up-staked and left Nuristan and the Kunar Valley, one of the most dangerous areas on the border, creating a vacuum is a question that only they can answer. That Pakistani dissidents were given safe havens in this vacuum and encouraged to attack Pakistan is for all to see and take note of. That the MOB (Mother of all Bombs) accounted for 14 Indians from Kerala amongst the causalities was never a surprise for us.

Our response lies mostly in the domain of diplomacy and in garnering support from friendly countries as far as possible, yet we must reserve the right and the option of responding in a reciprocal a manner if it comes to a physical conflict

That India is permitted to have so many consulates along the border, and none are processing visas is an obvious aberration. That Pakistan suffered horrendous terrorist attacks from Afghanistan through these bands of militants organized and facilitated in Kunar is a no brainer. The most damning aspect of this whole sorry episode is the narco issue that no one wants to talk about. A thriving drug trade amounting to a market value of $ 38 billion is hushed up. A trade under the nose of the US, and just as they do not control 40 % of the space, the damning implication of such a drug economy cannot be ignored.

Read more: Punishing Pakistan on Afghanistan: US Befuddled Policy

Pakistan has been a so called ally. It has captured the maximum Al Qaida operators than all countries combined. It has lost 70000 of its citizens, it has the highest military causalities, its officer dead and wounded to troop ratio is the highest in the world, its generals to troop causalities is unprecedented. The cost of war has devastated the infrastructure, caused millions of its people to be displaced and has affected the economy to the tune of $ 100 Billion.

It has cleared 48000 sq Km of its space, secured 3500 Km of lines of communication, it has established the writ of the government in these areas, people are returning home, the forces are popular and the borders controlled. But then even as I narrate this, it also saddens me. Do the Americans not know this? Are we just a victim of not having a narrative, a victim of a bad image or slanderous Haqqani shooting off his mouth? Could it be as simple as that?

Surely we can do without this $10.30, even if it did get to the people which it never did. We have also received, a total of $14 Billion since 2002 till today

No, that is not possible and I am convinced, that no amount of logic, no amount of reasoning will change the US posture towards Pakistan. The bias and the prejudice is despite what the US knows; the posture taken is premeditated and deliberate and therefore we must have been factored into some distant objective the US may have in mind and therefore action initiated against us must be a way to arrive at that objective.

The story of the safe havens we are accused of nurturing is so close to the engineered narrative about the weapons of mass destruction that were allegedly discovered in Iraq and is so much like the standard and predictable US method to madness i.e. create a false cases-belie, broad cast it and then respond to it with a pre-planned and designated physical force, that one, at the least, cannot fault the US for being true to its form.

Read more: The South Asian dilemma

However, at the moment I still feel that the US is going through the motion of the good-cop bad-cop routine and if we can stare them down effectively, they may back down. Remember, the US is a bully and the bully can never be appeased; the more you please, the more arrogant he gets.

The nature and character of this force do not appear to have a ground-holding capacity. So I can only conclude that it is intended to punish the Taliban from a distant. If that be true, to what purpose

However, we are warned in the first part of the new US maneuver while in the second part we are to expect a troop surge of 4000 troops to make a total of 12000 men. In the confused and tentative objectives of this two pronged strategy, the US is looking for its relief, its coup de grace, and conclusion to its military adventure in Afghanistan. How? The troop numbers cannot win back the 40% of space already lost, in fact, that cannot sustain the space they already have.

I see these troops now resorting to fire-power, bombings and long range artillery with a high ratio of the airborne component. The nature and character of this force do not appear to have a ground-holding capacity. So I can only conclude that it is intended to punish the Taliban from a distance. If that be true, to what purpose? To me, it appears that it endeavors to put the US in a better position to negotiate a power transfer.

To me, it looks that this ‘Unity’ Government is about to be ditched. To me, it looks that the Taliban have won a place at the table where they can secure the ways and means to be the future legitimate government of Afghanistan. To me, it also seems that the Indians may be the next US proxy and who might be foolish enough to take on this role. I hope they do. My hopes are founded on the likely outcome of such a stupidity if it ever comes to it.

Read more: Trumps’ new Afghan strategy- recipe for war, destruction and mayhem

The cost of war has devastated the infrastructure, caused millions of its people to be displaced and has affected the economy to the tune of $ 100 Billion

Coming to Pakistan; we are about to lose our privileged allied status. Were we ever privileged, did we discover any advantage or draw anything out of such a relationship? I think it is time to sever this relationship that has, in fact, cost us so much. So we hear about all the money and funds that the US taxpayers gave to us. I for one am thankful for their assistance, I would like to say to the people of the US that we are grateful for their contributions.

However, what did we get and should we always be told of what our obligations are on account of it? Well here are the bare facts; taking the year 2009 as a constant; we have received from the US a total of $ 61 Billion. Working on another constant of 180 million people at the time, this translates to $10.30/ head. Surely we can do without this $10.30, even if it did get to the people which it never did. We have also received, a total of $14 Billion since 2002 till today. Against a 175 Billion national economy, this hardly amounts to .0.5% of our GDP.

Like I said earlier, we are thankful for whatever we received and would never want to look a gift horse in the mouth but in no way do we feel that we are obligated due to such an insignificant amount or for that matter any amount, nor is the US entitled to make unreasonable demands on account of it, nor can we put our sovereignty or what remains of it, at the disposal of the US, because of it. We are not for sale.

Read more: Jeevay Jeevay Pakistan; but from now on, ‘Humaray Dum Se’

Three Generals of the US Army promised additional border deployment with a US brigade across the North Waziristan Border remains a promise unfulfilled and forgotten

So having lost the war in Afghanistan, for which they now wish to blame Pakistan, having parked our enemy in our back yard, having closed an eye to how we have been attacked from areas under their control and now being threatened for some ulterior motive, we must seek a suitable response. In my mind, the US will do what it has decided to do regardless of any explanations we have, any reasoning, narrative or argument that we present.

Whereas, our response lies mostly in the domain of diplomacy and in garnering support from friendly countries as far as possible, yet we must reserve the right and the option of responding in a reciprocal a manner if it comes to a physical conflict. We should be wary of the total lack of support from the Islamic countries and the so called Ummah as they have amply displayed and relied on ourselves more than anyone else.

My recommendation: a warning to Afghanistan that any hostile activity emanating from its territory will be taken as an act of war. That we shall respond by causing as much damage as we can in Kabul, Jalalabad, Kandahar, and Bagram. We have the range, capability, and capacity; they should be wary of testing it. This may deter any adventure the US has in mind – never be a bully!!!!

Lieutenant General Tariq KhanHI(M) was a Pakistan Army general officer who was the Commander of I Strike Corps at Mangla. A war hero, he has been the Inspector General of the Frontier Corps from September 2008 until October 2010. He has also commanded the 1st Armoured Division in Multan from 2006 to 2007 and then the 14th Infantry Division in South Waziristan till 2008. Khan gained fame when he led the Frontier Corps to victory against the Taliban in the Battle of Bajaur in 2009. The article was first posted on commandeleven.com. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Global Village Space’s editorial policy.

Lieutenant General Tariq Khan, HI(M) was a Pakistan Army general officer who was the Commander of I Strike Corps at Mangla. A war hero, he has been the Inspector General of the Frontier Corps from September 2008 until October 2010. He has also commanded the 1st Armoured Division in Multan from 2006 to 2007 and then the 14th Infantry Division in South Waziristan till 2008. Khan gained fame when he led the Frontier Corps to victory against the Taliban in the Battle of Bajaur in 2009.

9 COMMENTS

  1. Lt G Tariq sb! In your below sentence I guess % is wrong, although this is very minor issue but just a correction.
    “We have also received, a total of $14 Billion since 2002 till today. Against a 175 Billion national economy, this hardly amounts to .0.5% of our GDP.”

    I hope to see the part 2 of this column, should the situation deteriorate what repercussions the region could face that they havn’t seen yet. Moreover, Chabahar port is also ready to serve Afghans as an alternate rout that would pass through Taliban held areas.

  2. Very well and aptly described US predicament . But Bully they have always been all through their history . It takes only an age old practice to confront a bully and he backs off. North Koreans are just playing with them on the same line knowing their cow boy mentality . Diplomacy ,agreed but any wrong notion can only be addressed by being a little louder and we should speak a little louder .It helps where diplomacy fails.
    Good one general Tariq you hit the nail.

  3. The general must step forward and articulate /initiate a dialogue , so that the Talibans have a place on the conference table. The American President’s message indicates this direction as although wrapped in threats which are not new, spells out a negation of the idea of nation building and accepts any form of government as long as violence is put aside.
    The only thing new in the statement is this willingness for the very first time , while the threats are more of posturing. Even the threat of an increase in troops is insignificant and not a battle changer. I think this is a message of peace ,as Mr Trump would like to come out with a good deal knowing well that Afghans may be hating the Americans they have no love lost for the Russians , Chinese or the Pakistanis.
    The general must step forward as
    this he must do, being conversant with the dynamics of the Afghan problem, and for the sake of peace in the region and Pakistan.

    Lt Col ( Retd) Tariq Shah khan .
    37th PMA

  4. We Have a Plan for Pakistan (start of Tenure Trump)Dear Gen Tariq Sir, I feel There is a Plan Beneath this Choas…Some times The Ocean Surface is Calm but Beneath the Ocean surface the Currents are moving….U.S unwillingness not to Monitor the Afghan Pakistan border… and Letting the situation stay worse… provides the U.S the Reason to ‘Stay in Afghan Soil’ And keep on Pressuring Pakistan to ‘Do More’ While Facilitating India.. Pakistan’s Number one Enemy In afghanistan ….Tell me the Real Plan Exists Beneath this No Plan theme… U.S Logic designers have studied ‘choas’ for a long while… and know how to use Choas to their advantage and how to ‘Hide’ Plans in a Manufactured ‘Choas’///what you are seeing as Choas is an Illusion .. ‘the Real Plan is There… and it is to Disturb the Region Against Pakistan and China … and infavour of India in South Asia….Remember what trump Said at the Start of His Tenure….We have a Plan for Pakistan……

  5. President Trump’s tough talk on Pakistan will not mend domestic yet chaotic dynamics in Afghanistan. Trump’s approach to give more space for India in Afghanistan is worrisome in the sense that it will further enhance security anxieties within Pakistan. Both Pakistan and US needs each other for long and durable peace in Afghanistan.

  6. Pakistan need to develop strong infrastructure to strengthen its security and strong diplomatic skills to deter the political struggle it is fighting against the Indian and U.S. propagandas. Pakistan must adopt offensive policies, besides realizing the new opportunities associated in relations with China and Russia.

Comments & Discussion