Scientists at Johns Hopkins Medicine, using MRI scans and computer modeling, say they have further pinpointed areas of the human brain that regulate efforts to deal with fatigue.
The findings, they say, could advance the development of behavioral and other strategies that increase physical performance in healthy people, and also illuminate the neural mechanisms that contribute to fatigue in people with depression, multiple sclerosis and stroke.
The results of the research were published online Aug 12 in Nature Communications.
“We know the physiologic processes involved in fatigue, such as lactic acid build-up in muscles, but we know far less about how feelings of fatigue are processed in the brain and how our brain decides how much and what kind of effort to make to overcome fatigue,” says Vikram Chib, PhD, assistant professor of biomedical engineering at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and research scientist at the Kennedy Krieger Institute.
Knowing the brain regions that control choices about fatigue-moderating efforts can help scientists find therapies that precisely alter those choices, says Chib. “It might not be ideal for your brain to simply power through fatigue,” says Chib. “It might be more beneficial for the brain to be more efficient about the signals it’s sending.”
— Rheumatoid Arthritis (@RA_information) August 27, 2020
Researcher develops a novel way to quality how people feel
For the study, Chib first developed a novel way to objectively quantify how people “feel” fatigue, a difficult task because rating systems can vary from person to person. Physicians often ask their patients to rate their fatigue on a scale of 1 to 7, but like pain scales, such ratings are subjective and varied.
To standardize the metric for fatigue, Chib asked 20 study participants to make risk-based decisions about exerting a specific physical effort. The average age of participants was 24 and ranged from 18 to 34. Nine of the 20 were female.
The 20 participants were asked to grasp and squeeze a sensor after training them to recognize a scale of effort. For example, zero was equal to no effort and 50 units of effort were equal to half the participant’s maximum force. The participants learned to associate units of effort with how much to squeeze, which helped to standardize the effort level among individuals.
The participants repeated the grip exercises for 17 blocks for 10 trials each, until they were fatigued, they were offered one of two choices for making each effort. One was a random (“risky”) choice based on a coin flip, offering the chance to exert no effort or a predetermined effort level.
The other choice was a predetermined set effort level. By introducing uncertainty, the researchers were tapping into how each subject valued their effort — away, in effect, of shedding light on how their brains and minds decided how much effort to make.
The fatigue many of us feel right now is beyond tiredness. It's a signal that new ways of working (virtual,WFH, etc) have moved beyond being a response to an emergency to becoming locked in, within work systems that weren't designed for it: https://t.co/MMCcccfe1w By @simongterry
— Helen Bevan (@helenbevan) August 20, 2020
Based on whether the participant chose a risky option versus the predetermined one, the researchers used computerized programs to measure how participants felt about the prospect of exerting particular amounts of effort while they were fatigued.
“Unsurprisingly, we found that people tend to be more risk averse — to avoid — effort,” says Chib. Most of the participants (19 of 20) opted for the risk-free choice of a predetermined effort level. This means that, when fatigued, participants were less willing to take the chance of having to exert large amounts of effort.
“The predetermined amount had to get pretty high in relative effort for participants to choose the coin toss option,” says Chib.
Read more: How brain works when we are in LOVE?
Online Int’l News with additional input by GVS News Desk