News Analysis |
PM Khan in his 100 days interaction with TV hosts has hinted of a reshuffle in the Federal Cabinet. At the same time, he has clarified that aside from two minor differences he is completely in sync with the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
PM Imran Khan was quite confident about the cabinet ministers’ performance. “There is a strong possibility of changing cabinet ministers if any allegation of malfunctioning is found against them”, he said.
Zulfi Bukhari should not be allowed to work as a special assistant and his appointment be declared null and void as he is a dual national.
While interacting with senior anchors, PM expressed that, though, Dr. Azam Swati and Usman Buzdar acts are perceived at the critical approach, but, “the government should be appreciated for allowing a free and fair inquiry against them. Because, it wasn’t the common culture in Pakistan”, he said.
The inquiry of these cases without any political interference or using any authority pressure to mold the results is a healthy sign for strengthening democracy in Pakistan. Similarly, “We will obey the court orders. Azam Swati will resign if found guilty,” he said.
Read more: Zulfi Bukhari case: “PM is not all powerful”
However, the remarks taken under consideration by Chief Justice of Pakistan are not appreciated. The obligation against PM in Zulfi Bukhari case of nepotism is not welcoming. “What is wrong if the chief executive of a province calls a police officer to inquire about the alleged abuse suffered by somebody’s daughter, who happens to be the daughter of Bushra begum, at the hands of police?” PM Imran Khan asked a question during the interaction.
The Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan appointed Zulfiqar Hussain Bukhari, aka Zulfi Bukhari, one of his close friends, as his special assistant on overseas Pakistanis and human resource development soon after PTI came to power.
Bukhari had requested that his name be taken off the blacklist and asked for a “one-time permission” to travel abroad. Later on, PM Khan was accused of calling someone to take Zulfi’s name out of the list.
Soon after, a petition was filed by Adil Chattha and Abdul Moiz Baig in the SC to challenge the appointment of Zulfi Bukhari, seeking an order restraining Bukhari from holding the office as PM’s special assistant. The petition argues that if a dual national can’t be a member of the parliament, he/she should not be made PM’s special assistant. Zulfi Bukhari should not be allowed to work as a special assistant and his appointment be declared null and void as he is a dual national.
Moreover, the petition states that he (ZB) is currently under investigation by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). It further states that such an appointment “paves the way for dual-citizens and those guilty of inter-alia, misdeclaration of assets and contempt of court to be entrusted with decisions that determine the fate of the country”.
Read more: Prime Minister demands his own accountability – Maleeha Hashmey
Zulfi Bukhari is a close aide to the PM Khan. But he came under limelight when his name was placed in the blacklist. According to details, Syed Zulfiqar Bukhari, a businessman and British national, was informed by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on June 11, 2018, when he was about to leave for performing Umrah along with his friend PM Imran Khan that his name was on the blacklist.
Bukhari was stopped at the airport for almost three hours, according to the media reports. But later on, the Interior Ministry directed the authorities to let Bukhari go for performing Umrah. The then-Interior Minister Azam Khan said that he was told that Bukhari had “vowed to return [to Pakistan]” after which he had allowed the latter to leave the country for six days.
The SC is yet to decide the case against Mr. Bukhari but there is no denying of the fact that the criticism against him is politically motivated. Prime Minister hints at shuffle in the cabinet: Is there tension between the CJP & PM Khan?
Azam also told the Senate Standing Committee for Interior that the interior secretary had handed him a file and told him that a man named Zulfi Bukhari, who was on the “blacklist”, was stopped from leaving for Umrah with Imran.
Bukhari had requested that his name be taken off the blacklist and asked for a “one-time permission” to travel abroad. Later on, PM Khan was accused of calling someone to take Zulfi’s name out of the list. In an interview with a local TV channel, Mr. Khan openly challenged to prove if he had called any person for Bukhari or anyone else. Imran Khan made it clear that he did not call the interior ministry to get Zulfi Bukhari’s name out of the blacklist.
PM Khan had to face criticism after the appointment of Mr. Zulfi. For some analysts in Pakistan, PM’s opponents did not find anything else to bash at Khan, therefore, the PM is being criticized for the appointment of a friend as his special assistant.
Read more: Will SC disqualify Senator Azam Swati after JIT’s report?
Journalist and blogger Umaima Ahmed says that “This is a test case for [PM] Khan to show where he actually stands but then it also depends how far the case on Zulfi Bukhari holds value? Because this was raised in the interim government and at that time they wanted to create trouble for IK so he loses credibility during elections.”
Moreover, Ahmed Ali Naqvi, Lecturer in Political Science at PU, spoke to GVS and highlighted two interesting points with regard to the ongoing case against Mr. Zulfi Bukhari. “There are two objections to Mr. Bukhari’s appointment: one, he is dual national and secondly, he is under investigation by the National Accountability Bureau. The first objection is based on recent cases where the Supreme Court has dismissed some officials on the basis of dual nationality.
However, those who raise the objection fail to understand that his dual nationality is an added qualification for appointment as Special Assistant on Overseas Pakistanis.” While commenting on ongoing inquiry against Mr. Bukhari, Mr. Naqvi says that “on NAB, we must acknowledge that in Pakistan’s political system, there have been politically motivated cases in the past. Mere allegation, in Pakistan’s case, doesn’t warrant somebody to be ineligible for public office.”
Read more: Is Governor Punjab unhappy with CM Buzdar?
The SC is yet to decide the case against Mr. Bukhari but there is no denying of the fact that the criticism against him is politically motivated. Prime Minister hints at shuffle in the cabinet: Is there tension between the CJP & PM Khan?