| Welcome to Global Village Space

Sunday, April 14, 2024

Israel’s strategic interest in Jordan Valley

Israel has strategic interest in the Jordan Valley, which contains key resources. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in January described it as "vital" to Israel, vowing his government would "apply sovereignty" to the area.

An agricultural plain with precious water resources, the Jordan Valley makes up nearly a third of the occupied West Bank and is in Israel’s sights to annex.

Israel considers control of the plain, which sits between two desert mountain ranges, essential for its security. If Israel presses ahead with annexation, the valley will mark the country’s western border with Jordan.

Israel’s interest in Jordan Valley for key resources

The kingdom is just one of two Arab nations, along with Egypt, to have a peace deal with Israel. But the Israeli military sees the sparsely populated valley as a potential buffer zone in case of ground attacks.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in January described it as “vital” to Israel, vowing his government would “apply sovereignty” to the area.

Read more: Israel annexation of West Bank opposed by UAE

For the Palestinians, such a step would destroy “all chances of peace”.

Netanyahu has said annexation would exclude Palestinian population hubs such as the city of Jericho, which risks becoming an enclave surrounded by Israeli territory under the plan.

Controlled by Israel

Around 10,000 Israeli settlers live in the Jordan Valley, out of more than 450,000 in the entire West Bank, according to figures from NGOs and the Israeli government.

The valley is home to some 65,000 Palestinians, including around 20,000 Jericho residents, according to Israeli anti-occupation organisation B’Tselem.

Israeli settlements are viewed as illegal under international law, but Washington broke with this consensus in November and said it should be up to Israeli courts to decide on their legality.


The majority of the Jordan Valley is already administered by Israel, as it forms part of the West Bank’s “Area C” as outlined in the Oslo peace accords of the 1990s.

Area C covers around 60 percent of the West Bank, while Area B, which accounts for roughly 22 percent, is under Palestinian civil rule but Israeli security control.

The remaining Area A, which covers the eight major towns and cities including Jericho, is under full Palestinian control.

Lying south of Lake Tiberias and to the north of the Dead Sea, the Jordan Valley is also strategic for its agricultural land and water resources in the arid region.

But 85 percent of the valley is inaccessible to Palestinians, according to B’Tselem, while 56 percent is designated for military use.

Israel frequently demolishes Palestinian property built in Area C without Israeli permits, which are extremely hard to obtain.

The Jordan Valley accounts for the highest number of such demolitions in the West Bank, with some 2,400 structures levelled since 2009, according to European Union figures.

 US support for annexation 

Only a week before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intends to kick-start annexation plans in the occupied West Bank, Israel’s premier is facing challenges at home and abroad.

When Netanyahu clinched a coalition deal with former rival Benny Gantz, the longtime premier said political steps on annexing Jewish settlements and the Jordan Valley could start from July 1.

Read more: Israel’s Netanyahu struggles to sell annexation plans

The move forms part of a broader US peace plan, which foresees the eventual creation of a Palestinian state but denies their key demands such as a capital in east Jerusalem.

Palestinians reject annexation and thousands took part in a Monday protest in the town of Jericho, although other West Bank rallies have failed to draw large crowds.

The premier has just months left before his pro-Israeli ally, US President Donald Trump, risks being booted out of office in November elections.

Israel also stands to benefit from indecision within the European Union — the country’s top trade partner — which opposes annexation but remains divided on possible retaliatory measures.

AFP with additional input by GVS News Desk

What are your views on this? Share with us in the comments bar below.