If you’ve been trying to book an apartment for a short vacation in New York in recent weeks, you may have been surprised at how little is available on platforms like Airbnb or VRBO.
A city law went into effect this week that bans rentals for less than 30 days, leaving a good part of the 36,000 short-term tourist apartments in the city out of the rental game.
“I think New York’s making a big mistake and shooting themselves in the foot by keeping younger people out of the city,” said Joe McCambley, 66, a former regular client of Airbnb.
The new law only allows room rentals when the landlord lives in the apartment and is present during the entire stay. The visitors may number no more than two at a time, and they may not lock their room doors.
Hosts must register with the mayor’s office and pay $145 every two years. But permits are granted sparingly. Of the more than 3,800 applications registered so far, fewer than 300 have been approved.
Fines for violators range from $1,000 to $7,500, although guests will not be affected.
Property owners and platforms such as Airbnb complain bitterly about the law, but a fair number of city residents say they favor bringing short-term rentals back into the long-term market to ease a housing crunch.
“I think it’s probably necessary,” Marianne LeNabat, a 44-year-old city resident, told AFP.
“Housing is totally unaffordable in New York, and I don’t think a solution is ever just introducing more housing stock, but certainly taking tons and tons of units off the market is a problem.”
Read more: Street named after Allama Iqbal in New York
The mayor’s office wants to put an end to what it calls an illegal practice, which generates “noise, litter and personal safety” issues for permanent residents.
“Many permanent residential buildings do not have adequate security personnel to deal with travelers,” says the Office of Special Enforcement, charged with enforcing the ordinance passed in January 2022, after years of attempts to regulate the market.
– ‘You are not welcome’ –
The city clearly has Airbnb in its crosshairs with the new law, and the San Francisco-based platform vehemently objects to the measure.
“The city is sending a clear message to millions of potential visitors who will now have fewer accommodation options when they visit New York City: you are not welcome,” said Theo Yedinsky, global policy director for the platform.
In a city with rents averaging around $5,000 a month, one of the goals of the new ordinance is to get many of these tourist apartments back onto the long-term market, alleviating the city’s chronic housing shortage.
But many believe it will create a bigger crisis than it hopes to solve.
The organization RHOAR, which brings together small landlords of up to two homes, says that eliminating short-term rentals “will threaten owners’ ability to cover their mortgages, possibly creating an additional housing crisis,” and puts them “at acute financial and personal risk.”
This is the case of Tricia T. (she prefers not to give her last name), 63, who used to offer the ground floor of her two-story family home in Brooklyn as a short-term rental.
Recently retired, if she has to do without the $3,000 a month on average that the rent brought her, she may have to rethink going back to work, she tells AFP by telephone.
“Almost everybody in the group (RHOAR) owns their own home and… they bought it thinking they had the right to do whatever they wanted,” she said.
She said she would try to follow the law by renting only for periods longer than 30 days.
“Everybody’s waiting to see what’s going to happen next because no one can quite believe that this is a permanent change,” she added.
She said the organization would try to win an exemption for owners of only a few short-term rentals, while allowing the law to proceed for companies that rent dozens of short-term rentals.