notification
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Imtiaz Gul |

Government’s actions based on the JIT report on Dawn Leaks (dismissal of two technocrats) has unfortunately resuscitated the latent fault lines in Pakistan’s political landscape.

Almost at the same time, Supreme Court’s Panama ruling has exposed the contradictions as well as the impudence of Pakistan’s ruling elites.

As far the Panama ruling, the epilogue of a recent article from former ambassador Ashraf Jehangir Qazi comprehensively encapsulates the worrisome situation that resonated during the Panama case as well.

Read more: Pakistani Politics after Panama Decision: Lull before the Storm?

“Pakistan is among the countries most exposed to climate change, unmanageable population growth, leadership corruption, criminally irresponsible governance, economic collapse, and nuclear catastrophe. With a prime minister temporarily reprieved but permanently discredited by the supreme judiciary, ask not for whom the doomsday clock shall toll.”

This quote depicts an unfortunate reality of the current day Pakistan; civilian rulers ride into power using the chariot of democracy. But once ensconced in the position of power, their focus turns to personal and party gains instead of thinking of the federation of Pakistan and its teeming millions. Personal greed and self-glorification take precedence over good responsible governance, transparency, and accountability vis a vis the electorate take the back seat.

Noted commentator Ayaz Amir rightly described this “a state of mind” during a tv show, thereby meaning that once in power, the ruling elites love to dodge and dribble the law to their advantage, often at the cost of their own claims to democracy.

Side-stepping of the real issue remains open to debate, the refusal to publish the report in its entirety and acting on its recommendation is not.

Now to the Dawn leaks; the sacking, first of Pervez Rasheed, and then Tariq Fatmi and Rao Tehseen, the principal information officer, exemplifies this typical attitude. By offering the two as the scapegoats, the government naively believed it would dodge the General Headquarter (GHQ).

Read more: Civil-Military relations on social media: Has Pakistan turned into a laughing stock for the world?

This the prime minister’s office despite the understanding that the report of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) on the Dawn report would be made public and consequences will be drawn.

But the notification – that was rejected through the ISPR in a direct dig at the prime minister’s office – reflected an altogether different story – contrary to what the GHQ had expected as a result of the joint investigation. It took the notification as a flagrant violation of the understanding and a side-stepping of the real issue.

While the latter i.e. side-stepping of the real issue, remains open to debate, the refusal to publish the report in its entirety and acting on its recommendation is not. It is about trust between two state institutions, which we thought had become even following the appointments of General Qamar Bajwa and General Naveed Mukhtar. But the “notification” simply laid bare the assumption of a smooth relationship. And that clearly is rooted in a disagreement over an issue that is close to GHQ’s heart.

If the government really believes the GHQ went overboard, the only option it has is to dismiss the army chief. But it knows the “notification” is a clever deflection from the real issue.

Those looking at it as a purely legal issue (the armed forces are subordinate to the civilian government) forget that in this country laws and constitutions are often applied only selectively; how can those ministers and bureaucrats being led by an undeclared, unofficial scion of the PM declare an official tweet by the GHQ – a constitutional organ of the state – as ultra vires and unconstitutional?

If the government really believes the GHQ went overboard, the only option it has is to dismiss the army chief. But it knows the “notification” is a clever deflection from the real issue. It also exposes the fault-lines within the government, whereby the minister of interior says only he is authorized to dismiss the advisor on foreign affairs and the PIO.

Read more: Public forced resignation: Has the PM left us with no choice?

Since the issue has dragged Pakistan’s name all over the world with regard to the civil-military relations, it would be good for both the PM House and the GHQ to indulge in consultations away from the gaze of the media. One good step would be to make the report public. Hapless millions of Pakistanis do have a right to know what the JIT found out and as to whether it concluded that the national security had been breached through the Dawn report.

Imtiaz Gul is the founder and Executive Director of the Centre for Research and Security Studies (CRSS), an Islamabad-based think tank. He is the author of Pakistan: Pivot of Hizbut Tahrir’s Global Caliphate. This article was originally published in Daily Times and has been republished with permission. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Global Village Space’s editorial policy.

Imtiaz Gul is the founder and Executive Director of Center for Research and Security Studies, an Islamabad-based think tank that he founded in December 2007. He is a prominent columnist and author of several books on South Asia including “Pakistan: Before & After Osama Bin Laden”. He regularly appears as an analyst on Pakistani TV channels as well as the Doha-based Al-Jazeera English/Arabic satellite TV channel for his expertise in areas such as Afghanistan/Tribal Areas / and the Kashmir militancy. He is a prominent columnist writing for the Express Tribune, Daily Times, Foreign Policy and many others. He is the author of several books on South Asia, his latest book “Pakistan: Before & After Osama Bin Laden”. He regularly appears as an analyst on Pakistani TV channels as well as the Doha-based Al-Jazeera English/Arabic satellite TV channel for his expertise in areas such as Afghanistan/Tribal Areas / and the Kashmir militancy. He has presented papers and given talks at universities and international security and counter-terror conferences in Brussels, Tokyo, Berlin, New Delhi, Kabul, New York, Washington, the Hague, Riyadh, Italy, Oslo, Stockholm, Beijing. http://www.imtiazgul.com/

Comments & Discussion