| Welcome to Global Village Space

Friday, February 16, 2024

Taliban Delegation’s Visit: Are Peace Talk Prospects Better?

Trump administration is looking for a way out of Afghanistan and 18 years long war it waged on it. Pakistan is trying to mediate between the two parties and has been putting efforts to resolve the crisis. Yet, US wants to safeguard its dominance over region thus complicating the issue.

Opinion |

The Afghan Taliban representatives met Pakistan’s leaders in Islamabad, last week. The movement’s leaders have put across their stance on the many contentious issues that came up for discussion during their marathon of talks with American officials in Doha, Qatar.

After President Trump abruptly called off the talks in early September, the Taliban leaders went to Moscow and then to Beijing to apprise the leaders of the two important regional countries of the inexplicable and unwarranted unilateral US action of terminating the year-long peace talks.

Some Taliban representatives have also reportedly gone to Iran on a similar mission.

The wholly unexpected announcement by Trump regarding the cancellation of the peace initiative took everyone by surprise. The decision caused deep disillusionment not only in the ranks of the Taliban but in the regional countries that have been adversely affected by the long conflict.

The US fears that in the event of its withdrawal, a vacuum will be created for China to begin dominating the region on the back of a successful completion of its iconic Belt and Road Initiative project.

Not only did President Trump throw a bombshell thereby ending the peace negotiations, but he also declared his resolve to hit the Taliban harder than ever before. That intention was translated into reality as US warplanes began to drop bombs indiscriminately on populated areas, striking a group of farm laborers in Nangarhar and a wedding party in Helmand province. Dozens of innocent civilians were killed in the gruesome attacks, including women and children.

The Taliban also, in desperation, began to mount more lethal attacks on government forces and installations. Many civilians lost their lives in these attacks too. The rising spiral of violence created more fear and anxiety in a population that has been traumatized by an unending and brutal conflict.

The visit of the Taliban leaders has to be seen in the perspective of whether there is any hope for resuming the stalled talks or not. More than the Taliban leaders’ presence in Islamabad, the spotlight was on the visit of Zalmay Khalilzad, the US Special Envoy and chief negotiator of the Afghan peace process, because of his arrival in Islamabad was seen as evidence of the US intention to resume the peace negotiations. Mr. Khalilzad, besides meeting Pakistani leaders, also had two meetings with the Taliban delegation.

Although nothing was officially revealed regarding any real effort to restart the peace negotiations, there was a feeling of optimism in the air because the only apparent rationale for Khalilzad’s visit is a desire to restart talks with the Taliban.

Read more: Afghan Taliban & Kabul Govt. show willingness to talk: FM Qureshi

The US is in a dilemma. The war in Afghanistan that has gone on for 18 years can go on indefinitely. There is no end to this conflict as there was no goal to accomplish when the US unleashed this war. The US fears that in the event of its withdrawal, a vacuum will be created for China to begin dominating the region on the back of the successful completion of its iconic Belt and Road Initiative project. But the march of times cannot be reversed by the fears of global power. The ground realities are such that the US has to acquiesce in a political scenario in the region in which China has to be seen as a major actor both militarily and economically.

There is a silver lining for the US in this situation. If it chooses to depart militarily from Afghanistan following an agreement with the Taliban, it could continue to wield influence in the area in terms of its huge political and economic clout and it’s potential to extend vital economic and technological assistance. The US must decide which side of the spectrum it wishes to be on.

If it continues to hang on to its support for a Kabul government that has lost legitimacy, power, and control, it will lose the sympathy and support of the people. Not only that, but it will find itself isolated in the scheme of things in the larger political landscape of this whole region. No matter who gets elected as president in the Afghan elections, the electoral process has lost credibility because of a depressingly low voter turnout.

The task for the US is by no means easy. It has to navigate an extremely complex path of political manoeuvering. An elected president — regardless of how few people voted for him, has to have some role in a transition to a new system. On the one hand, the US would be required to show some consideration for an institution that it has helped create and on the other, it has to cater to the demands of the Taliban for a lion’s share in a government they would hope to dominate.

Read more: Afghan Taliban in Islamabad: Pakistan’s Role in Regional Peace

Perhaps the old Afghan institution of a Loya Jirga has to be convened to break the impasse. Traditionally and historically, the Loya Jirga has never failed to address and seek viable solutions to the complex constitutional imbroglios Afghanistan faces. The Loya Jirga will not fail this time around either.

The recent prisoners swap between the US and the Taliban is a good omen for the resumption of dialogue. Because many bitter lessons have been learnt and because the lingering chaos could lead to a messier situation, there is an expectation that once the talks begin they would not end without a tangible and viable outcome.

Let us hope this optimism materializes.

Rustam Shah Mohmand is a former interior secretary and a former ambassador. This article was originally appeared at The Express Tribune and has been republished with author’s permission. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Global Village Space.