| Welcome to Global Village Space

Monday, July 15, 2024

The race of supremacy in the Indo-Pacific region

Zubair Ali Soomro talks about the new agreement of the US, AUKUS, and QUAD and how they will play a role for US in the US-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific Region. The repeated reference to “Indo-Pacific”, a policy frame promoted by the Trump administration, reflects the Biden administration’s continued outreach to the region and the way US foreign policy has been recast by China’s expanding influence.

Amid the growing US-China rivalry for supremacy, geopolitics has been altered to gain favor for oneself and outsmart rivals. This time the battlefield is the Indo-Pacific region. Since the US has forged AUKUS, the regional countries are concerned about this move. AUKUS is a defense agreement- comprising Australia, UK, and the US- which is aimed to maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific with nuclear-powered submarines potential on patrol and the deal enables Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

China retorted it and termed it “Cold War Mentally” and claimed such partnership is an anti-china clique. They do not have any definite purpose behind this agreement but to contain China’s rise. Signing such deals will destabilize the peace and trigger an arms race in the region. She claimed that they, in order to contain China’s growth, are throwing military net around it in waterways like the South China Sea and attempting to halt China’s economic development.

Read more: Eyeing China, Biden seeks a free & open Indo-Pacific with Quad allies

North Korea: the country everyone should watch out for 

Also, Malaysia and Indonesia fuss with this move and are of the view that this will speed up the arms race and aggression in the region; North Korea chastised this maneuver claiming it as undesirable and dangerous and stated that it will underscore North Korea to continue developing its arsenals of atomic weapons; Some Russian Diplomatic officials dubbed it a step to accelerate arm race and undermine the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Besides regional countries, France was also ticked off with AUKUS, due to the cancellation of the previously signed deal of $66 billion between France and Australia for conventional submarines, which will cost France jobs and revenue.

On the contrary, India and Japan, the antagonists of China and members of an anti-china pact namely the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (also known as QUAD), have warmly welcomed this measure. But in reality, the AUKUS is nothing more than a potential hazard for the region, in which Washington is adopting an Asian versus Asian strategy to pit their fight to contain China’s rise and sell its weaponry. However, the results of this gathering storm can be far beyond the thoughts of political scientists and eagerly participating Australia.

The first unanticipated loss of this pact is the deteriorating ties of Australia with France. Reportedly, this in consequence has kept Australia away to finalise a free trade agreement with the European Union. Apart from this, Scott Morison’s, Australian Prime Minister, planned visit to Indonesia has been canceled, because Indonesian President Joko Widodo is no longer available. Australia has been victimized in the US-China rivalry which has its first consequence in the loss of robust ties with France and Indonesia.

Read more: Countering China: EU-India growing ties in the Indo-Pacific

China vs Australia 

Apart, Since Australia had close economic relation with China, Australian Trade Union has opposed this maneuver; It has shamed the AUKUS deal and insisted they do not want war with China and warned of dangers to the country on multiple fronts. Also, the Maritime Union of Australia has opposed this deal and verbalized that Prime Minister should not engineer such secret deals instead supply vaccines and help lockdown affected.

Moreover, a China state-owned newspaper, Global Times, warned arms race and grimly stated that Australian soldiers were likely to be first to die if China counterattacks.

To sum this deal, without having any challenge to Australia, buying nuclear-powered submarines is a potential step toward endangering and victimizing itself for nothing but US gain.

Apart from this alliance, the US has Quad and Five Eyes to focus on China and keep China’s power from spreading. Quad is consisting of the US, Japan, India and Australia. The main purposes of this alliance were economic and security interests that span the Pacific and Indian oceans. Quad was actually tailored for tsunami relief efforts, which lay dormant until 2017. Later, it was revived by Trump to challenge China from every front. And, Five Eyes is pertaining to the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

All the Quad members have poor diplomatic relations or even face-off with China, which strengthens the US position in the region and collectively they are sparing no effort to undermine China’s rise.

On September 24, Quad had an in-person summit, in which they had discussed vaccine export, trade, and technology. They also said, “We stand for the rule of law freedom of navigation and overflight, peaceful resolution of disputes, democratic values, and territorial integrity of states.” besides this the main purpose behind the meeting was to opt strategy to counter China.

Read more: Why must Suez Canal and Egypt be included in the US’s Indo-Pacific Strategy?

China and US: the power politics competition 

In addition to this, the Biden administration had made clear that it desires to forge a united front of democracies to deal with China across the board- on security, trade, technology, and human rights. Actually, the desire is to make an alliance of democracies to defeat China. All the maneuvers the US is taking are not to safeguard any human right but to contain China’s economic influence and military power.

However, Chinese spokesman, Mr. Lijian said: “Faced with the common challenge of fighting the epidemic and economic recovery, the people of the Asia-Pacific region need growth and employment, not submarines and gunpowder.” He further vocalized, “Individual powers have repeatedly dispatched military aircraft and warships to the South China Sea that spark trouble and deliberately provoke conflicts on maritime issues.

And, Chinese determination to safeguard national and territorial sovereignty, maritime rights and interest is unwavering, and all will continue to properly handle differences with the countries connected through consultation and negotiations.” This statement clarifies that China does not want war rather prefers consultations, but it is not necessary that it is the reality; China has already focused military power. If both rivals escalate military power, then danger will loom and exacerbate already worsened diplomatic ties.

Furthermore, Japan is another active member of Quad, who is ardently participating in the US-China rivalry. However, participation can be equally annihilatory for Japan.

Li haidong, a professor at the Institute of International relations of China Foreign Affairs University, viewed that Japan has been leaving no stone unturned to use the anti-China clique to gain an upper hand in its territorial conflicts with China, Russia and on the Korean peninsula issue.

Further, Chinese analysts also warned Japan, India and Australia that if they went too far in following the US strategy of containing China, they will become cannon fodder as China will steadily safeguard its interests.

Read more: Why Russia warns India against the US’ Indo-Pacific plans

Additionally, China’s rocketing influence and military power deter America. If China finds any danger from the US, China’s missile arsenal could annihilate American bases in Asia during opening hours. Equally gruesome for the US is China’s rapidly growing economic reach, which has expanded state-owned companies to buy up strategic assets such as ports around the globe that could be harnessed in times of war.

To encapsulate, this ebbing situation can destabilize peace in the region. Both the powers should repair their completely dysfunctional relationship and evade forging blocs in the region. If the region divides into blocs, regional as well as global peace will be at risk.

The writer is a freelance columnist based in Karachi, Pakistan. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Global Village Space.