The UK Home Office is facing criticism from immigration experts and members of the British Sudanese community for operating a refugee system that has been labelled “unashamedly racist”. Despite running refugee schemes for individuals escaping the war in Ukraine, the Home Office has refused to offer individuals fleeing the recent fighting in Sudan similar safe and legal routes to the UK.
Evacuation EffortÂ
The final UK-run evacuation flight from Khartoum flew out last week, and the lack of options offered by the government has stoked concerns that it has adopted a racist immigration policy. With the possibility of a new scheme to deal with the fallout of the conflict highly unlikely, it appears that Sudanese refugees are being treated differently from white Ukrainians. Almost 300,000 visas have been issued for Ukrainians fleeing their country, and nearly 95,000 have been approved for a family scheme allowing Ukrainian refugees to join relatives in the UK.
Read More: Ukraine tried to assassinate Putin by drone, Kremlin says
The Racism of Immigration System
Caitlin Boswell, policy and advocacy manager for the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants charity, has commented that “the racism of the UK’s immigration system couldn’t be more clear, with this government drawing (up) policies affecting people seeking safety along stark racial lines”. She goes on to note that “at the same time, ministers are using unashamedly inflammatory and far-right language, whipping up hatred towards black and brown migrants.” This sentiment is echoed by Fizza Qureshi, the chief executive of the Migrants’ Rights Network, who has noted that “the blatant refusal to provide the level of sanctuary and safety for Sudanese refugees in comparison to white Ukrainians has firmly exposed the unashamedly racist thinking at the heart of immigration legislation. They (the government) have created a segregated refugee system. It is clear that any shred of compassion for black and brown refugees has well and truly disappeared.”
The Government’s Response
According to a UK government spokesperson, the focus is on preventing a humanitarian emergency in Sudan, and the government is working with international partners and the UN to end the fighting. They reject the comparison and setting of vulnerable groups against each other. However, the Refugee Council’s chief executive, Enver Solomon, notes that the Home Office has the discretion to grant visas in exceptional circumstances but has chosen not to do more for Sudanese people. “It has significant discretion it can use to grant visas, particularly in response to exceptional circumstances, but has decided not to,” says Solomon.
Discriminatory Refugee Policies Must End
The UK government’s immigration policies have come under fire for being discriminatory against refugees based on their race and ethnicity. While the government has provided safe and legal routes for Ukrainian refugees fleeing conflict, it has refused to do the same for those escaping the recent fighting in Sudan. Enver Solomon, the chief executive of the Refugee Council, has called for the prioritisation of safe routes for all refugees, regardless of their background. Discrimination against refugees based on their race or ethnicity must end, and the UK government must take action to ensure that all refugees are treated with compassion and dignity.
Read More: The launch of the Association of Muslim Surveyors in UK
The UK government’s differential treatment of refugees based on their race and ethnicity is deeply concerning. The Home Office’s refusal to provide safe and legal routes for Sudanese refugees, while simultaneously operating schemes for Ukrainian refugees, raises questions about the fairness and impartiality of the UK’s immigration policies. The government must do more to address these concerns and ensure that refugees are not discriminated against based on their race or ethnicity. It is crucial to prioritise the creation of safe routes for refugees from all parts of the world, and not just those that are more politically expedient.Â