Elon Musk has said he would reverse Donald Trump’s ban from Twitter, accusing the social media company of leftwing bias that had aggravated political divisions in the US. “I think it was a morally bad decision, and foolish in the extreme,” Musk said of the lifetime ban of Trump, which was imposed soon after a mob of the former president’s supporters invaded the US Capitol on January 6 last year. Musk has agreed to buy the social media platform for roughly $44bn. “I would reverse the permaban [on Trump],” he added. “Obviously I don’t own Twitter yet, so this is not a thing that will definitely happen.”
The comments, made in an interview at the FT’s Future of the Car conference, marked a sharp escalation of the Tesla chief executive’s attacks on Twitter’s attempts to weed out hate speech and misinformation. “Banning Trump from Twitter didn’t end Trump’s voice,” Musk said. “It will amplify it among the right. This is why it’s morally wrong and flat-out stupid.”
Read more: Elon Musk expected to serve as temporary Twitter CEO
In his first interview since reaching a deal to buy Twitter two weeks ago, the world’s richest person repeated assertions that he was mounting the biggest-ever personal acquisition of a company in order to help improve what he called “currently the least-bad public square” online. Until now, Musk has avoided taking political sides in the fight over Twitter’s moderation policies, despite echoing many of the complaints from rightwing politicians and commentators.
But on Tuesday, he came out aggressively against what he claimed was a “strong left bias” at the social media company. Rather than any intentional bias on the part of workers, the platform’s political leaning probably resulted from the location of its headquarters in San Francisco, he added.
Read more: Elon Musk mulls charging fee for Twitter?
Twitter’s political leaning “fails to build trust in other parts of the United States, and also perhaps other parts of the world”, he said. “Twitter needs to be much more even-handed.” Musk has already publicly criticized the platform’s executives involved in some of the company’s controversial moderation decisions, drawing criticism from many social media experts who claimed he does not understand the complexities of preventing hate and misinformation from taking over social media sites.
Reuters with additional input by GVS