Embryonic genetic testing- a moral dilemma

According to the findings of a recent survey published in the journal Science, Americans are becoming more and more concerned with the cognitive function of their future offspring and are even willing to test their IVF embryos to determine which one has the best chance of enrolling in college and should, therefore, be chosen for birth.


According to a recent survey, 40% of Americans are open to having the intellectual capacity of their IVF embryos tested. The public poll, which was conducted by economists and other experts and published in the journal Science, surprisingly, found strong support for the embryonic experiments, which suggests that the US may need to move quickly to establish regulations for the technology. A US business called Genomic Prediction currently sells embryonic prediction tests, but it only provides results that pertain to a child’s likelihood of later developing common illnesses like schizophrenia or diabetes. According to the statement, there are no plans to start giving educational aptitude tests.

The technology-based modification and manipulation of an organism’s genes is known as genetic engineering, sometimes known as genetic modification or genetic manipulation. Genetic engineering includes cloning, genetic alteration, and genetic testing. Since the technology of genetic engineering was first introduced, there have been debates about its usage. For many years, people have employed genetic engineering to influence the types of offspring they will have.

Read more: Macron feared Russia will steal DNA, refused Covid test

Although the majority of these technologies have focused on chromosomal and monogenic illnesses and traits, the majority of human phenotypes are extremely polygenic and impacted by the environment. The advocates of genetic engineering contend that the technology can be applied for the good of the human race, such as by cloning organs to help those who are unable to obtain organ donors. The use of biotechnology and genetic engineering, however, raises ethical questions for society, according to bioethicists, and the consequences of tampering with nature can be catastrophic. To put it into perspective, the poll’s findings indicate that people would prefer to evaluate IVF embryos soon after fertilization to determine which embryos are suitable for being born into the world.

Gene editing for a successful life?

The new survey follows the discovery of the “polygenic score” last year, a genetic test that may infer from genes, among other things, whether or not someone will be more or less likely to attend college. According to studies, DNA influences how far people progress in school, a life outcome that is linked to a person’s IQ. Even though DNA is not the ultimate determiner and the environment has a big impact, gene tests are remarkably accurate. In the poll, the researchers told people to assume that around 3% of kids will go to a top-100 college. By picking one of the ten IVF embryos with the highest gene score, parents would increase that chance to 5% for their kids.

However, it will be difficult to demonstrate that these tests actually function, which is an issue. For example, it would be decades before anyone could determine whether their predictions of a newborn’s health risks were true. There are also concerns, even if the tests are accurate. The use of embryo tests to produce healthier, taller, or more intelligent offspring, for example, may only be available to members of specific socioeconomic categories, according to bioethicists. This could exacerbate already-existing social inequities.

The latest survey also contrasted people’s willingness to use SAT prep classes, embryo screenings, and gene editing on embryos to improve the prospects of their offspring. Even the most extreme option, genetic modification, which is illegal in the United States and many other countries, received some support. About 28% of those surveyed indicated that they would probably do so if it were safe, indicating that these people would allow genetic engineers to artificially enhance the intellect of their embryos. “They support the existence of a gap between the generally negative attitudes of researchers and health professionals… and the attitudes of the general public,” says Shai Carmi, a geneticist and statistician at the Hebrew University in Israel who studies embryo selection technology.

Read more: Precision medicines and it’s implication for national security

The utility of the testing is still debated among IVF professionals. Although academic aptitude assessments for embryos are not yet available, the experts think it is not safe to assume the technology will remain under wraps for very long. For instance, practically everyone opposed “test tube babies” until IVF was invented in the 1970s. When it finally worked, popular opinion quickly shifted. Only approximately 17% of individuals have severe moral objections to testing embryos, according to the most recent poll, and 38% would probably do it to improve their chances of getting a good education if given the chance. Only 6% of the people in the US are ethically opposed to IVF today. Although no child has yet been chosen from a petri dish based only on their academic aptitude rating, that day may not be too far off.

HOLD ON! BEFORE YOU CONTINUE with your routine, ponder this: How probable is it that the article you've just finished would have been created by another news agency if Global Village Space hadn't taken the initiative?

Imagine a media landscape devoid of Global Village Space. Who would keep the political elite in check, upholding the values they claim to embrace? How many hidden covert operations, injustices, and dystopian technologies would stay concealed if our journalists weren't actively pursuing the truth?

The type of journalism we conduct is crucial to a functioning democracy, but it's neither simple, inexpensive, nor profitable. Global Village Space operates as an independent nonprofit news outlet.

We stand free from corporate influences. Would you support us?

Latest news