AFP |
US President Donald Trump hardened his defence against the Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation Monday, branding the probe “unconstitutional” and declaring that he has an “absolute right” to pardon himself of any crime.
While both claims lack strong legal foundation, according to most experts, they signalled that the president is doubling down against Mueller’s probe into campaign collusion with Russia and whether Trump sought to obstruct justice.
Critics have accused the department of granting Mueller too broad a mandate. In the only court challenge to that so far, a judge supported Mueller.
“As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?” he said on Twitter.
“The appointment of the Special Counsel is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Despite that, we play the game because I, unlike the Democrats, have done nothing wrong!” he added in a second tweet.
Read more: Trump ‘could pardon himself over Russia but won’t’, says Giuliani
It was the first time Trump asserted the power to pardon himself, an issue never before tested in courts.
It comes as the White House and Mueller’s team were girding for a possible high-stakes legal showdown over whether Trump will agree to or be forced to be interviewed by investigators, as well as a possible impeachment push that could result from the probe.
While Mueller has indicted 19 people and three companies in his year-old investigation, including several former top campaign aides to Trump, the investigation has so far made no allegations against the president himself.
It is hard to imagine judicial backing of these views,” said Mark Rozell, dean of the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University and author of a book on presidential powers.
But questions they have submitted to the White House indicate Mueller is examining Trump’s actions, including his firing of former FBI director James Comey, for possible obstruction of justice.
Trump’s lawyers don’t want him to be interviewed by Mueller, accusing the independent prosecutor, himself a former FBI chief, of trying to “trap” the president in a lie.
Read more: Trump says: Summit with Kim is back on
A 20-page January letter from Trump’s lawyers to Mueller that leaked to the media over the weekend argued that the White House has answered all of Mueller’s questions and requests, and so he cannot legally force the president to answer questions.
“Your office clearly lacks the requisite need to personally interview the president,” it said.In a warning, it also claimed he had the power, “if he wished, to terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon if he so desired.”
– ‘No one above the law’ –
Pressed by reporters later Monday on whether Trump believes he is above the law, White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders replied: “Certainly no one is above the law.”But she also brushed off queries on why Trump would suggest he might need a pardon.
“The appointment of the Special Counsel is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Despite that, we play the game because I, unlike the Democrats, have done nothing wrong!” he added in a second tweet.
“Thankfully the president hasn’t done anything wrong and therefore wouldn’t need one,” she said. Legal experts said Trump was claiming executive privileges that few presidents had ever claimed before.
“Trump is making some incredibly expansive claims of executive power, as though there are no separation of powers limits on his authority. It is hard to imagine judicial backing of these views,” said Mark Rozell, dean of the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University and author of a book on presidential powers.
Read more: Summit plans revived as Trump receives a “very nice” letter from…
“This understanding of presidential power is radical and absolutist,” former United States attorney and deputy assistant attorney general Harry Litman wrote in the New York Times.
Trump’s assertion that Mueller’s investigation is illegal came only after 13 months of the investigation.
The investigation was established last year by the Department of Justice under a standing special counsel law. But critics have accused the department of granting Mueller too broad a mandate. In the only court challenge to that so far, a judge supported Mueller.
Sanders declined to specify why Trump called the probe unconstitutional, saying only that unnamed “scholars” had raised questions about it. She referred questions to the Justice Department, which had already declined to comment.
© Agence France-Presse