Seven U.S. military officers, who heard graphic descriptions last week of the brutal treatment of a Pakistani detainee at the hands of CIA, have urged that he be granted clemency in a letter addressed to the officer who will review the case, The New York Times reported Monday.
The officers, all but one member of an eight-member military jury, condemned the U.S. government’s conduct in the letter on behalf of Majid Khan, a Baltimore high school graduate turned Qaeda courier.
“Mr. Khan was subjected to physical and psychological abuse well-beyond approved enhanced interrogation techniques, instead of being closer to torture performed by the most abusive regimes in modern history,” the jury members wrote in a letter addressed to the Arkansas National Guard’s Colonel Jeffrey Wood, the convening authority of the military commission.
Read more: Former Pentagon official says US shouldn’t trust Pakistan?
“This abuse was of no practical value in terms of intelligence, or any other tangible benefit to U.S. interests. Instead, it is a stain on the moral fiber of America; the treatment of Mr. Khan in the hands of U.S. personnel should be a source of shame for the U.S. government,” they continued, according to The Times.
The harsh rebuke comes after the Guantanamo Bay detainee testified last Thursday on the abuse he suffered while in the CIA’s overseas prison network between 2003 and 2006.
He said he had been subjected to waterboarding, forced enemas and feedings, as well as other forms of sexual and physical abuse.
Majid Khan, a Pakistani, detailed dungeonlike conditions and episodes of abuse at CIA sites. He pleaded guilty to terrorism charges including delivering $50,000 to an Al Qaeda affiliate. He admitted plotting a failed effort to assassinate Pervez Musharraf. https://t.co/G5VBUO4YUm
— Ihsanullah Tipu Mehsud (@IhsanTipu) October 29, 2021
Majid Khan said that even while he cooperated with officials, he continued to endure more abuse. “Instead, the more I cooperated, the more I was tortured,” he said.
The seven jury members wrote that Khan had been a “vulnerable target for extremist recruiting” because he had been reeling from the death of his mother at the time. They argued that he was no longer an extremism threat and was remorseful of his past actions.
The jury sentenced Khan to 26 years, the lowest allowed according to the court’s instructions.
Sentencing was delayed for nearly a decade after his guilty plea to give Khan time and opportunity to cooperate with federal and military prosecutors, so far behind the scenes, in federal and military terrorism cases.
Read more: Who is America’s number one enemy?
In the intervening years, prosecutors and defense lawyers clashed in court filings over who would be called to testify about Khan’s abuse in C.I.A. custody, and how.
The panel was provided with nine letters of support for Khan from family members, including his father and several siblings — American citizens who live in the United States — as well as his wife, Rabia, and daughter, Manaal, who was born in Pakistan and live there.