News Desk |
Researchers from the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich, United Kingdom, and the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH) carried out the study. They revealed that an experimental urine test, called Prostate Urine Risk (PUR), can find cancers that will require treatment within the first 5 years of diagnosis.
The findings now appear in the journal BJU International. The team included Prof. Colin Cooper, Dr. Daniel Brewer, and Dr. Jeremy Clark, from UEA’s Norwich Medical School. Rob Mills, Marcel Hanna, and Prof. Richard Ball, of the NNUH, provided support.
Doctors tend to use these results, or a series of results, to determine if someone needs a biopsy.
To develop this unique test, the researchers looked at gene expression in the urine samples of 535 men and determined the cell-free expression of 167 different genes. They then established a combination of 35 different genes that the scientists considered risk signatures, or biomarkers, that the PUR test could look for.
Read more: Can vaccines prevent cancer?
— Michael Greger, M.D. (@nutrition_facts) July 4, 2019
This test is unique in that it can sort people into different risk groups, thereby demonstrating the aggressiveness of cancer. “This research shows that our urine test could be used to not only diagnose prostate cancer without the need for an invasive needle biopsy but to identify a [person’s] level of risk,” says Dr. Clark.
The researchers looked at gene expression in the urine samples of 535 men and determined the cell-free expression of 167 different genes.
“This means that we could predict whether or not prostate cancer patients already on active surveillance would require treatment. The really exciting thing is that the test predicted disease progression up to 5 years before it was detected by standard clinical methods.”
“Furthermore,” he adds, “the test was able to identify men that were up to eight times less likely to need treatment within 5 years of diagnosis.”
Prostate cancer is common but slow-growing
According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), around 1 in 9 men will receive a diagnosis of prostate cancer during their lifetime. In 2019, the ACS estimate that there will be around 174,000 new cases of prostate cancer and over 31,000 deaths from the condition.
That said, most cases of prostate cancer do not result in death. In fact, the 5-year survival rate for localized and regional prostate cancer is nearly 100%, and even when combined with those who have distant-stage prostate cancer, the overall survival rate is still 98%.
Could focal therapy be the next treatment revolution for prostate cancer? 👀
Prof. Ahmed tells us about his clinical trial, which could take focal therapy a step closer to men to cure prostate cancer, while minimising side effects. Learn more 👉 https://t.co/1zf8Ei2gCu pic.twitter.com/jVnMUwCtif
— Prostate Cancer UK (@ProstateUK) July 10, 2019
Not counting skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men. Thanks to early detection techniques, doctors can diagnose and treat many cases early. Because it is a slow growing cancer, tests usually find before it has the chance to spread.
Read more: Can bacteria fight cancer?
What this test means in a clinical setting
There are many ways to help identify prostate cancer. Although a prostate biopsy is the only way to definitely diagnose the condition, there are a few screening tests that can indicate if a biopsy is necessary. For example, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test can help detect the possible presence of prostate cancer.
This test is unique in that it can sort people into different risk groups, thereby demonstrating the aggressiveness of the cancer.
Doctors tend to use these results, or a series of results, to determine if someone needs a biopsy. Doctors might also perform a digital rectal exam to see if there are areas on the prostate that could be cancer. Although it is less effective than a PSA test, it can sometimes find cancers in people with normal PSA levels.
The PUR test goes one step further; it not only identifies the presence of cancer earlier than other tests, but it can also help put people into different risk groups so that doctors can more accurately determine the course of care and whether to watch and wait, take a biopsy, or start treatment immediately.
“If this test was to be used in the clinic, large numbers of men could avoid an unnecessary initial biopsy and the repeated, invasive follow-up of men with the low-risk disease could be drastically reduced.”